Alabama
Alabama has $5.4B in tracked subsidies across 961 beneficiary companies. 148 of these companies also donated to political campaigns (15% donor rate). County-level data available for 67 of 67 counties.
$5.4B
Total Subsidies Tracked
961
Beneficiary Companies
148
Donor-Beneficiaries Matched
15% donor rate
$7.9M
Total Donated by Beneficiaries
County Overview
67 counties ranked by subsidy total. Click any county for full details.
Jefferson
$191.9M
Wilcox
$202.1M
Mobile
$1985.2M
Talladega
$247.7M
Coosa
$28.9M
Madison
$997.0M
Tuscaloosa
$458.6M
Morgan
$235.0M
Jackson
$81.0M
Montgomery
$338.6M
Baldwin
$349.3M
Coffee
$59.9M
Limestone
$81.4M
Macon
$10.0M
Lee
$70.8M
Covington
$13.3M
Autauga
$14.8M
Colbert
$6.0M
Walker
$2.1M
Marion
$2.4M
St. Clair
$6.4M
Dekalb
$4.1M
Chambers
$0.5M
Houston
$1.6M
Key Findings
- 148 of 961 subsidized companies (15.4%) made campaign donations — $7.9M total.
- $599,949 in donations flowed from beneficiaries to 27 political committees. Top recipient: PROGRESSPAC ($215,204).
- $5.39B in total subsidies tracked across 961 beneficiary companies in Alabama.
Political Committee Activity
$0.6M
Total donated to committees
27
Committees receiving funds
Top recipient: PROGRESSPAC ($215K — 1.2% beneficiary-funded)
All Counties
| County | Score | Total Subsidies | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jefferson | 70.0 | $191.9M | 0 |
| Wilcox | 55.0 | $202.1M | 0 |
| Mobile | 49.5 | $1985.2M | 0 |
| Talladega | 43.6 | $247.7M | 0 |
| Coosa | 42.9 | $28.9M | 0 |
| Madison | 41.8 | $997.0M | 0 |
| Tuscaloosa | 41.8 | $458.6M | 0 |
| Morgan | 39.2 | $235.0M | 0 |
| Jackson | 36.5 | $81.0M | 0 |
| Montgomery | 35.1 | $338.6M | 0 |
| Baldwin | 34.3 | $349.3M | 0 |
| Coffee | 32.7 | $59.9M | 0 |
| Limestone | 30.0 | $81.4M | 0 |
| Macon | 29.0 | $10.0M | 0 |
| Lee | 27.0 | $70.8M | 0 |
| Covington | 26.4 | $13.3M | 0 |
| Autauga | 24.5 | $14.8M | 0 |
| Colbert | 20.6 | $6.0M | 0 |
| Walker | 20.1 | $2.1M | 0 |
| Marion | 20.0 | $2.4M | 0 |
| St. Clair | 19.4 | $6.4M | 0 |
| Dekalb | 18.8 | $4.1M | 0 |
| Chambers | 13.6 | $0.5M | 0 |
| Houston | 13.6 | $1.6M | 0 |
| Cullman | 11.5 | $0.7M | 0 |
| Calhoun | 4.9 | $0.1M | 0 |
| Barbour | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Bibb | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Blount | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Bullock | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Butler | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Cherokee | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Chilton | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Choctaw | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Clarke | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Clay | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Cleburne | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Conecuh | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Crenshaw | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Dale | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Dallas | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Elmore | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Escambia | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Etowah | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Fayette | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Franklin | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Geneva | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Greene | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Hale | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Henry | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Lamar | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Lauderdale | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Lawrence | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Lowndes | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Marengo | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Marshall | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Monroe | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Perry | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Pickens | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Pike | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Randolph | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Russell | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Shelby | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Sumter | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Tallapoosa | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Washington | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Winston | 0.0 | — | 0 |
How we calculated this
State summaries aggregate county-level data from Good Jobs First subsidy records cross-referenced with state campaign finance databases. Donor rates reflect the percentage of subsidy recipients matched to campaign contributors. County scorecards use a composite weighted score (subsidy concentration 35%, donor overlap 30%, tax burden 20%, WARN notices 15%).