Arkansas
Arkansas has $0.3B in tracked subsidies across 1355 beneficiary companies. 109 of these companies also donated to political campaigns (4% donor rate). County-level data available for 75 of 75 counties.
$0.3B
Total Subsidies Tracked
1,355
Beneficiary Companies
109
Donor-Beneficiaries Matched
4% donor rate
$0.3M
Total Donated by Beneficiaries
County Overview
75 counties ranked by subsidy total. Click any county for full details.
Sebastian
$339.0M
Pulaski
$0.0M
Arkansas
$0.0M
Ashley
$0.0M
Baxter
$0.0M
Benton
$0.0M
Boone
$0.0M
Bradley
$0.0M
Calhoun
$0.0M
Carroll
$0.0M
Chicot
$0.0M
Clark
$0.0M
Clay
$0.0M
Cleburne
$0.0M
Cleveland
$0.0M
Columbia
$0.0M
Conway
$0.0M
Craighead
$0.0M
Crawford
$0.0M
Crittenden
$0.0M
Cross
$0.0M
Dallas
$0.0M
Desha
$0.0M
Drew
$0.0M
Key Findings
- 109 of 1,355 subsidized companies (4.5%) made campaign donations — $254,547 total.
- $6,676 in donations flowed from beneficiaries to 13 political committees. Top recipient: Gary Don Stubblefield ($2,500).
- $339M in total subsidies tracked across 1,355 beneficiary companies in Arkansas.
Political Committee Activity
$0.0M
Total donated to committees
13
Committees receiving funds
Top recipient: Gary Don Stubblefield ($2K — 2.13% beneficiary-funded)
All Counties
| County | Score | Total Subsidies | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sebastian | 55.0 | $339.0M | 0 |
| Pulaski | 45.0 | — | 0 |
| Arkansas | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Ashley | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Baxter | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Benton | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Boone | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Bradley | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Calhoun | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Carroll | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Chicot | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Clark | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Clay | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Cleburne | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Cleveland | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Columbia | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Conway | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Craighead | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Crawford | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Crittenden | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Cross | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Dallas | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Desha | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Drew | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Faulkner | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Franklin | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Fulton | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Garland | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Grant | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Greene | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Hempstead | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Hot Spring | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Howard | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Independence | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Izard | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Jackson | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Jefferson | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Johnson | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Lafayette | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Lawrence | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Lee | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Lincoln | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Little River | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Logan | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Lonoke | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Madison | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Marion | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Miller | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Mississippi | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Monroe | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Montgomery | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Nevada | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Newton | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Ouachita | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Perry | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Phillips | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Pike | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Poinsett | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Polk | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Pope | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Prairie | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Randolph | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Saline | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Scott | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Searcy | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Sevier | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Sharp | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| St Francis | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Stone | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Union | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Van Buren | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Washington | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| White | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Woodruff | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Yell | 0.0 | — | 0 |
How we calculated this
State summaries aggregate county-level data from Good Jobs First subsidy records cross-referenced with state campaign finance databases. Donor rates reflect the percentage of subsidy recipients matched to campaign contributors. County scorecards use a composite weighted score (subsidy concentration 35%, donor overlap 30%, tax burden 20%, WARN notices 15%).