Colorado
Colorado has $1.1B in tracked subsidies across 4680 beneficiary companies. 1236 of these companies also donated to political campaigns (26% donor rate). County-level data available for 64 of 64 counties.
County Overview
65 counties ranked by subsidy total. Click any county for full details.
Key Findings
- 1,236 of 4,680 subsidized companies (26.4%) made campaign donations — $93.2M total.
- $49.4M in donations flowed from beneficiaries to 981 political committees. Top recipient: PROTECTING COLORADO'S ENVIRONMENT, ECONOMY, AND ENERGY INDEPENDENCE ($21.7M).
- $1.06B in total subsidies tracked across 4,680 beneficiary companies in Colorado.
Political Committee Activity
Top recipient: PROTECTING COLORADO'S ENVIRONMENT, ECONOMY, AND ENERGY INDEPENDENCE ($21696K — 2.19% beneficiary-funded)
All Counties
| County | Score | Total Subsidies | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| Denver | 4.4 | $275.3M | 0 |
| Douglas | 4.2 | $95.7M | 0 |
| El Paso | 4.2 | $39.1M | 0 |
| Fremont | 3.9 | $1.7M | 0 |
| Mesa | 3.9 | $8.7M | 0 |
| Routt | 3.9 | $2.7M | 0 |
| Elbert | 3.8 | $26.7M | 0 |
| Alamosa | 3.8 | $3.1M | 0 |
| Garfield | 3.8 | $8.7M | 0 |
| Logan | 3.8 | $5.1M | 0 |
| Saguache | 3.8 | $1.9M | 0 |
| San Juan | 3.7 | $0.2M | 0 |
| Sedgwick | 3.7 | $1.0M | 0 |
| Adams | 3.6 | $40.0M | 0 |
| Jefferson | 3.6 | $25.9M | 0 |
| Prowers | 3.6 | $10.5M | 0 |
| Weld | 3.6 | $22.7M | 0 |
| Custer | 3.5 | $0.2M | 0 |
| Broomfield | 3.5 | $8.0M | 0 |
| Dolores | 3.4 | $1.0M | 0 |
| Arapahoe | 3.3 | $96.4M | 0 |
| Boulder | 3.3 | $12.7M | 0 |
| Kit Carson | 3.3 | $13.0M | 0 |
| Morgan | 3.3 | $16.5M | 0 |
| Delta | 3.2 | $6.3M | 0 |
| San Miguel | 3.2 | $0.1M | 0 |
| Montrose | 3.0 | $4.1M | 0 |
| Archuleta | 2.9 | $1.6M | 0 |
| Otero | 2.6 | $1.7M | 0 |
| Huerfano | 2.6 | $0.6M | 0 |
| Mineral | 2.6 | $0.4M | 0 |
| Pueblo | 2.4 | $12.0M | 0 |
| Chaffee | 2.3 | $1.1M | 0 |
| Clear Creek | 2.0 | $1.7M | 0 |
| Larimer | 2.0 | $5.2M | 0 |
| Costilla | 1.8 | — | 0 |
| Crowley | 1.8 | — | 0 |
| Statewide | 1.8 | — | 0 |
| Summit | 1.7 | $0.0M | 0 |
| Baca | 1.0 | — | 0 |
| Bent | 1.0 | — | 0 |
| Cheyenne | 1.0 | — | 0 |
| Conejos | 1.0 | — | 0 |
| Eagle | 1.0 | — | 0 |
| Gilpin | 1.0 | — | 0 |
| Grand | 1.0 | — | 0 |
| Gunnison | 1.0 | — | 0 |
| Hinsdale | 1.0 | — | 0 |
| Jackson | 1.0 | — | 0 |
| Kiowa | 1.0 | — | 0 |
| La Plata | 1.0 | — | 0 |
| Lake | 1.0 | — | 0 |
| Las Animas | 1.0 | — | 0 |
| Lincoln | 1.0 | — | 0 |
| Moffat | 1.0 | — | 0 |
| Montezuma | 1.0 | — | 0 |
| Ouray | 1.0 | — | 0 |
| Park | 1.0 | — | 0 |
| Phillips | 1.0 | — | 0 |
| Pitkin | 1.0 | — | 0 |
| Rio Blanco | 1.0 | — | 0 |
| Rio Grande | 1.0 | — | 0 |
| Teller | 1.0 | — | 0 |
| Washington | 1.0 | — | 0 |
| Yuma | 1.0 | — | 0 |
How we calculated this
State summaries aggregate county-level data from Good Jobs First subsidy records cross-referenced with state campaign finance databases. Donor rates reflect the percentage of subsidy recipients matched to campaign contributors. County scorecards use a composite weighted score (subsidy concentration 35%, donor overlap 30%, tax burden 20%, WARN notices 15%).