Iowa has $5.7B in tracked subsidies across 2330 beneficiary companies. 35 of these companies also donated to political campaigns (2% donor rate). County-level data available for 99 of 99 counties.

$5.7B Total Subsidies Tracked
2,330 Beneficiary Companies
35 Donor-Beneficiaries Matched 2% donor rate
$0.1M Total Donated by Beneficiaries

County Overview

100 counties ranked by subsidy total. Click any county for full details.

Show all 100 counties

Key Findings

  • 35 of 2,330 subsidized companies (1.5%) made campaign donations — $118,246 total.
  • $260 in donations flowed from beneficiaries to 3 political committees. Top recipient: Anesa Kajtazovic for Iowa House ($150).
  • $5.73B in total subsidies tracked across 2,330 beneficiary companies in Iowa.

Political Committee Activity

$0.0M Total donated to committees
3 Committees receiving funds

Top recipient: Anesa Kajtazovic for Iowa House ($0K — 0.37% beneficiary-funded)

All Counties

County-level subsidy data for Iowa
CountyScoreTotal SubsidiesCompanies
Polk50.6$927.1M0
Scott44.8$153.9M0
Linn40.4$510.7M0
Clarke18.6$15.8M0
Adams17.9$66.7M0
Webster16.3$249.3M0
Buena Vista14.6$164.5M0
Dubuque13.9$269.7M0
Black Hawk13.7$274.8M0
Muscatine13.3$210.4M0
Pottawattamie12.5$238.1M0
Chickasaw11.0$98.2M0
Mitchell10.8$90.7M0
Floyd10.4$109.2M0
Plymouth10.2$133.1M0
Story10.1$194.4M0
Wapello10.1$149.6M0
Hardin9.4$101.7M0
Wright9.3$86.9M0
Iowa7.4$79.6M0
Des Moines7.2$114.5M0
Kossuth7.2$74.6M0
Cass7.0$68.2M0
Clinton6.9$112.8M0
Tama6.8$72.0M0
Lee6.4$96.0M0
Delaware6.3$68.6M0
Crawford6.2$63.1M0
Poweshiek6.1$70.5M0
Palo Alto5.4$39.4M0
Marshall4.9$73.7M0
Buchanan4.5$52.6M0
Page4.3$43.2M0
Jackson3.6$42.2M0
Woodbury3.5$67.0M0
Allamakee3.3$32.6M0
Cedar3.3$37.3M0
Cerro Gordo3.3$54.1M0
Johnson3.3$67.3M0
Decatur3.2$20.2M0
Carroll2.9$35.3M0
Humboldt2.9$22.8M0
Jasper2.8$40.9M0
Emmet2.1$16.2M0
Appanoose1.8$15.8M0
Jefferson1.8$19.2M0
Shelby1.8$15.6M0
Washington1.7$21.0M0
Fayette1.4$16.0M0
Ida1.1$6.7M0
Winnebago1.1$9.7M0
Boone1.0$13.9M0
Clay0.8$8.2M0
Guthrie0.8$7.0M0
Marion0.8$12.7M0
Cherokee0.6$5.4M0
Franklin0.6$5.0M0
Monroe0.6$3.5M0
Sioux0.6$8.7M0
Clayton0.5$5.3M0
Sac0.5$3.6M0
Dallas0.4$7.1M0
Fremont0.4$2.7M0
Henry0.4$4.5M0
Wayne0.4$2.1M0
Howard0.3$2.1M0
Osceola0.3$1.5M0
Pocahantas0.3$6.4M0
Dickinson0.2$2.0M0
Harrison0.2$2.0M0
Jones0.2$1.8M0
Montgomery0.2$1.8M0
Warren0.2$3.0M0
Hancock0.1$0.9M0
Pocahontas0.1$0.9M0
Adair0.00
Audubon0.00
Benton0.0$1.0M0
Bremer0.0$0.9M0
Butler0.00
Calhoun0.00
Davis0.00
Greene0.00
Grundy0.00
Hamilton0.00
Keokuk0.00
Louisa0.00
Lucas0.00
Lyon0.0$0.4M0
Madison0.00
Mahaska0.0$0.6M0
Mills0.00
Monona0.0$0.4M0
O'Brien0.00
Ringgold0.00
Taylor0.00
Union0.00
Van Buren0.00
Winneshiek0.0$0.9M0
Worth0.00
How we calculated this

State summaries aggregate county-level data from Good Jobs First subsidy records cross-referenced with state campaign finance databases. Donor rates reflect the percentage of subsidy recipients matched to campaign contributors. County scorecards use a composite weighted score (subsidy concentration 35%, donor overlap 30%, tax burden 20%, WARN notices 15%).

Full methodology →