Kansas has $1.0B in tracked subsidies across 2145 beneficiary companies. 183 of these companies also donated to political campaigns (9% donor rate). County-level data available for 105 of 105 counties.

$1.0B Total Subsidies Tracked
2,145 Beneficiary Companies
183 Donor-Beneficiaries Matched 9% donor rate
$1.3M Total Donated by Beneficiaries

About these scores and findings: Scores, donor rates, and spike counts on this page are pattern-detection outputs computed from public records. They document correlations and timing patterns in the data; they are not findings of wrongdoing by any company, official, or agency.

Companies that donated to political committees affiliated with IDA-appointing officials received tax exemptions. This analysis documents a correlation between donations and exemptions; it does not establish that donations caused approvals.

County Overview

105 counties ranked by subsidy total. Click any county for full details.

Show all 105 counties

Key Findings

  • 183 of 2,145 subsidized companies (8.5%) made campaign donations — $1.3M total.
  • $626,117 in donations flowed from beneficiaries to 37 political committees. Top recipient: Derek Schmidt ($150,767).
  • 3 companies showed statistically significant pre-award donation spikes (BH-corrected, q<0.05). Top: Kaw Valley Engineering Inc (28.3× baseline, z=36.0).
  • $998M in total subsidies tracked across 2,145 beneficiary companies in Kansas.

Political Committee Activity

$0.6M Total donated to committees
37 Committees receiving funds

Top recipient: Derek Schmidt ($151K — 0.53% beneficiary-funded)

Pre-Award Donation Spikes

3 companies showed statistically unusual donation increases in the years around their subsidy award (Benjamini-Hochberg corrected, q<0.05).

Largest spike: Kaw Valley Engineering Inc (28.3× baseline, z=36)

All Counties

County-level subsidy data for Kansas
CountyScoreTotal SubsidiesCompanies
Allen0.00
Anderson0.00
Atchison0.00
Barber0.00
Barton0.00
Bourbon0.00
Brown0.00
Butler0.00
Chase0.00
Chautauqua0.00
Cherokee0.00
Cheyenne0.00
Clark0.00
Clay0.00
Cloud0.00
Coffey0.00
Comanche0.00
Cowley0.00
Crawford0.00
Decatur0.00
Dickinson0.00
Doniphan0.00
Douglas0.00
Edwards0.00
Elk0.00
Ellis0.00
Ellsworth0.00
Finney0.00
Ford0.00
Franklin0.00
Geary0.00
Gove0.00
Graham0.00
Grant0.00
Gray0.00
Greeley0.00
Greenwood0.00
Hamilton0.00
Harper0.00
Harvey0.00
Haskell0.00
Hodgeman0.00
Jackson0.00
Jefferson0.00
Jewell0.00
Johnson0.00
Kearny0.00
Kingman0.00
Kiowa0.00
Labette0.00
Lane0.00
Leavenworth0.00
Lincoln0.00
Linn0.00
Logan0.00
Lyon0.00
Marion0.00
Marshall0.00
Mcpherson0.00
Meade0.00
Miami0.00
Mitchell0.00
Montgomery0.00
Morris0.00
Morton0.00
Nemaha0.00
Neosho0.00
Ness0.00
Norton0.00
Osage0.00
Osborne0.00
Ottawa0.00
Pawnee0.00
Phillips0.00
Pottawatomie0.00
Pratt0.00
Rawlins0.00
Reno0.00
Republic0.00
Rice0.00
Riley0.00
Rooks0.00
Rush0.00
Russell0.00
Saline0.00
Scott0.00
Sedgwick0.00
Seward0.00
Shawnee0.00
Sheridan0.00
Sherman0.00
Smith0.00
Stafford0.00
Stanton0.00
Stevens0.00
Sumner0.00
Thomas0.00
Trego0.00
Wabaunsee0.00
Wallace0.00
Washington0.00
Wichita0.00
Wilson0.00
Woodson0.00
Wyandotte0.00
How we calculated this

State summaries aggregate county-level data from Good Jobs First subsidy records cross-referenced with state campaign finance databases. Donor rates reflect the percentage of subsidy recipients matched to campaign contributors. County scorecards use a composite weighted score (subsidy concentration 35%, donor overlap 30%, tax burden 20%, WARN notices 15%).

Full methodology →