Minnesota has $0.7B in tracked subsidies across 2152 beneficiary companies. 31 of these companies also donated to political campaigns (1% donor rate). County-level data available for 87 of 87 counties.

$0.7B Total Subsidies Tracked
2,152 Beneficiary Companies
31 Donor-Beneficiaries Matched 1% donor rate
$8.3M Total Donated by Beneficiaries

About these scores and findings: Scores, donor rates, and spike counts on this page are pattern-detection outputs computed from public records. They document correlations and timing patterns in the data; they are not findings of wrongdoing by any company, official, or agency.

Companies that donated to political committees affiliated with IDA-appointing officials received tax exemptions. This analysis documents a correlation between donations and exemptions; it does not establish that donations caused approvals.

County Overview

87 counties ranked by subsidy total. Click any county for full details.

Show all 87 counties

Key Findings

  • 31 of 2,152 subsidized companies (1.4%) made campaign donations — $8.3M total.
  • $22,685 in donations flowed from beneficiaries to 4 political committees. Top recipient: Housing First Fund ($15,000).
  • $713M in total subsidies tracked across 2,152 beneficiary companies in Minnesota.

Political Committee Activity

$0.0M Total donated to committees
4 Committees receiving funds

Top recipient: Housing First Fund ($15K — 1.27% beneficiary-funded)

All Counties

County-level subsidy data for Minnesota
CountyScoreTotal SubsidiesCompanies
Olmsted55.0$586.3M0
St. Louis46.0$13.7M0
Ramsey26.7$60.1M0
Wright10.4$3.1M0
Sherburne6.0$5.7M0
Kandiyohi5.8$2.3M0
Scott5.8$6.8M0
Dodge5.6$0.8M0
Martin5.5$0.7M0
Kanabec5.4$0.4M0
Dakota5.3$7.3M0
Hennepin5.1$11.6M0
Otter Tail5.1$0.5M0
Pine5.1$0.2M0
Fillmore5.0—0
Watonwan0.7$0.5M0
Kittson0.6$0.2M0
Stearns0.6$5.9M0
Brown0.5$0.8M0
Clay0.5$2.0M0
Winona0.4$1.2M0
Douglas0.2$0.5M0
Blue Earth0.1$0.6M0
Carver0.1$0.4M0
Cass0.1$0.2M0
Chisago0.1$0.2M0
Norman0.1$0.0M0
Swift0.1$0.0M0
Aitkin0.0—0
Anoka0.0—0
Becker0.0—0
Beltrami0.0—0
Benton0.0$0.0M0
Big Stone0.0—0
Carlton0.0—0
Chippewa0.0—0
Clearwater0.0—0
Cook0.0—0
Cottonwood0.0—0
Crow Wing0.0—0
Faribault0.0—0
Freeborn0.0—0
Goodhue0.0$0.1M0
Grant0.0—0
Houston0.0—0
Hubbard0.0—0
Isanti0.0—0
Itasca0.0—0
Jackson0.0—0
Koochiching0.0—0
Lac Qui Parle0.0—0
Lake0.0$0.0M0
Lake Of The Woods0.0—0
Le Sueur0.0—0
Lincoln0.0—0
Lyon0.0—0
Mahnomen0.0—0
Marshall0.0—0
Mcleod0.0—0
Meeker0.0—0
Mille Lacs0.0$0.0M0
Morrison0.0—0
Mower0.0$0.0M0
Murray0.0—0
Nicollet0.0—0
Nobles0.0$0.0M0
Pennington0.0—0
Pipestone0.0—0
Polk0.0$0.0M0
Pope0.0—0
Red Lake0.0—0
Redwood0.0—0
Renville0.0—0
Rice0.0—0
Rock0.0—0
Roseau0.0—0
Sibley0.0—0
Steele0.0$0.0M0
Stevens0.0—0
Todd0.0—0
Traverse0.0—0
Wabasha0.0—0
Wadena0.0—0
Waseca0.0—0
Washington0.0$0.7M0
Wilkin0.0—0
Yellow Medicine0.0—0
How we calculated this

State summaries aggregate county-level data from Good Jobs First subsidy records cross-referenced with state campaign finance databases. Donor rates reflect the percentage of subsidy recipients matched to campaign contributors. County scorecards use a composite weighted score (subsidy concentration 35%, donor overlap 30%, tax burden 20%, WARN notices 15%).

Full methodology →