Mississippi
Mississippi has $0.3B in tracked subsidies across 1352 beneficiary companies. 122 of these companies also donated to political campaigns (9% donor rate). County-level data available for 82 of 82 counties.
County Overview
82 counties ranked by subsidy total. Click any county for full details.
Key Findings
- 122 of 1,352 subsidized companies (9.0%) made campaign donations — $1.7M total.
- $535,742 in donations flowed from beneficiaries to 68 political committees. Top recipient: Delbert Hosemann ($95,225).
- 1 company showed statistically significant pre-award donation spikes (BH-corrected, q<0.05). Top: Waste Management (4.3× baseline, z=13.5).
- $347M in total subsidies tracked across 1,352 beneficiary companies in Mississippi.
Political Committee Activity
Top recipient: Delbert Hosemann ($95K — 0.8% beneficiary-funded)
Pre-Award Donation Spikes
1 companies showed statistically unusual donation increases in the years around their subsidy award (Benjamini-Hochberg corrected, q<0.05).
Largest spike: Waste Management (4.3× baseline, z=13.5)
All Counties
| County | Score | Total Subsidies | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scott | 60.5 | $6.0M | 0 |
| Rankin | 55.1 | $33.0M | 0 |
| Pike | 46.4 | $0.7M | 0 |
| Forrest | 40.8 | $10.9M | 0 |
| Lee | 37.7 | $9.3M | 0 |
| Warren | 33.4 | $1.7M | 0 |
| Alcorn | 30.2 | $0.1M | 0 |
| Harrison | 30.1 | $16.4M | 0 |
| Lincoln | 27.9 | $2.4M | 0 |
| Jones | 22.7 | $0.1M | 0 |
| Montgomery | 20.1 | $4.2M | 0 |
| Clarke | 19.0 | $5.5M | 0 |
| Lafayette | 16.2 | $8.5M | 0 |
| Lauderdale | 14.4 | $8.6M | 0 |
| Lowndes | 13.5 | $3.3M | 0 |
| Leflore | 10.3 | $1.1M | 0 |
| Washington | 4.8 | $2.4M | 0 |
| Jackson | 2.1 | $1.4M | 0 |
| Marion | 2.1 | $0.8M | 0 |
| Madison | 1.9 | $1.2M | 0 |
| Grenada | 1.7 | $0.6M | 0 |
| Adams | 1.4 | $0.6M | 0 |
| Hinds | 0.3 | $0.2M | 0 |
| Tippah | 0.3 | $0.1M | 0 |
| Sunflower | 0.1 | $0.1M | 0 |
| Union | 0.1 | $0.1M | 0 |
| Amite | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Attala | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Benton | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Bolivar | 0.0 | $0.0M | 0 |
| Calhoun | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Carroll | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Choctaw | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Claiborne | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Clay | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Coahoma | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Copiah | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Covington | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Desoto | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Franklin | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| George | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Greene | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Hancock | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Holmes | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Humphreys | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Issaquena | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Itawamba | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Jasper | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Jefferson | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Jefferson Davis | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Kemper | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Lamar | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Lawrence | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Leake | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Marshall | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Monroe | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Neshoba | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Newton | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Noxubee | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Oktibbeha | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Panola | 0.0 | $0.0M | 0 |
| Pearl River | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Perry | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Pontotoc | 0.0 | $0.0M | 0 |
| Prentiss | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Quitman | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Sharkey | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Simpson | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Smith | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Stone | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Tallahatchie | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Tate | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Tishomingo | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Tunica | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Walthall | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Wayne | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Webster | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Wilkinson | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Winston | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Yalobusha | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Yazoo | 0.0 | — | 0 |
How we calculated this
State summaries aggregate county-level data from Good Jobs First subsidy records cross-referenced with state campaign finance databases. Donor rates reflect the percentage of subsidy recipients matched to campaign contributors. County scorecards use a composite weighted score (subsidy concentration 35%, donor overlap 30%, tax burden 20%, WARN notices 15%).