New Mexico
New Mexico has $0.4B in tracked subsidies across 1072 beneficiary companies. 133 of these companies also donated to political campaigns (12% donor rate). County-level data available for 33 of 33 counties.
About these scores and findings: Scores, donor rates, and spike counts on this page are pattern-detection outputs computed from public records. They document correlations and timing patterns in the data; they are not findings of wrongdoing by any company, official, or agency.
Companies that donated to political committees affiliated with IDA-appointing officials received tax exemptions. This analysis documents a correlation between donations and exemptions; it does not establish that donations caused approvals.
County Overview
33 counties ranked by subsidy total. Click any county for full details.
Key Findings
- 133 of 1,072 subsidized companies (12.4%) made campaign donations — $3.0M total.
- $428,598 in donations flowed from beneficiaries to 131 political committees. Top recipient: New Mexicans for Michelle ($83,114).
- $424M in total subsidies tracked across 1,072 beneficiary companies in New Mexico.
Political Committee Activity
Top recipient: New Mexicans for Michelle ($83K — 0.05% beneficiary-funded)
All Counties
| County | Score | Total Subsidies | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| Santa Fe | 45.0 | — | 0 |
| San Miguel | 20.2 | — | 0 |
| Los Alamos | 9.6 | — | 0 |
| Dona Ana | 7.8 | — | 0 |
| Torrance | 4.0 | — | 0 |
| Bernalillo | 3.1 | — | 0 |
| Taos | 3.1 | — | 0 |
| Catron | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Chaves | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Cibola | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Colfax | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Curry | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| De Baca | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Eddy | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Grant | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Guadalupe | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Harding | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Hidalgo | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Lea | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Lincoln | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Luna | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Mckinley | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Mora | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Otero | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Quay | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Rio Arriba | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Roosevelt | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| San Juan | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Sandoval | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Sierra | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Socorro | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Union | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Valencia | 0.0 | — | 0 |
How we calculated this
State summaries aggregate county-level data from Good Jobs First subsidy records cross-referenced with state campaign finance databases. Donor rates reflect the percentage of subsidy recipients matched to campaign contributors. County scorecards use a composite weighted score (subsidy concentration 35%, donor overlap 30%, tax burden 20%, WARN notices 15%).