Nevada
Nevada has $0.1B in tracked subsidies across 741 beneficiary companies. 201 of these companies also donated to political campaigns (12% donor rate). County-level data available for 17 of 17 counties.
About these scores and findings: Scores, donor rates, and spike counts on this page are pattern-detection outputs computed from public records. They document correlations and timing patterns in the data; they are not findings of wrongdoing by any company, official, or agency.
Companies that donated to political committees affiliated with IDA-appointing officials received tax exemptions. This analysis documents a correlation between donations and exemptions; it does not establish that donations caused approvals.
County Overview
17 counties ranked by subsidy total. Click any county for full details.
Key Findings
- 201 of 741 subsidized companies (11.9%) made campaign donations — $3.7M total.
- $380,342 in donations flowed from beneficiaries to 20 political committees. Top recipient: REPUBLICAN STATE LEADERSHIP COMMITTEE ($171,500).
- $146M in total subsidies tracked across 741 beneficiary companies in Nevada.
Political Committee Activity
Top recipient: REPUBLICAN STATE LEADERSHIP COMMITTEE ($172K — 0.17% beneficiary-funded)
All Counties
| County | Score | Total Subsidies | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clark | 90.3 | $69.8M | 0 |
| Washoe | 73.7 | $11.0M | 0 |
| Lyon | 69.5 | $9.2M | 0 |
| Douglas | 62.8 | $3.3M | 0 |
| Storey | 59.3 | $5.1M | 0 |
| Churchill | 54.4 | $8.8M | 0 |
| Humboldt | 52.7 | $3.4M | 0 |
| Elko | 48.7 | $2.1M | 0 |
| Carson City | 36.4 | $1.1M | 0 |
| Esmeralda | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Eureka | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Lander | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Lincoln | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Mineral | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Nye | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Pershing | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| White Pine | 0.0 | — | 0 |
How we calculated this
State summaries aggregate county-level data from Good Jobs First subsidy records cross-referenced with state campaign finance databases. Donor rates reflect the percentage of subsidy recipients matched to campaign contributors. County scorecards use a composite weighted score (subsidy concentration 35%, donor overlap 30%, tax burden 20%, WARN notices 15%).