Tennessee
Tennessee has $1.9B in tracked subsidies across 3214 beneficiary companies. 291 of these companies also donated to political campaigns (9% donor rate). County-level data available for 39 of 95 counties.
$1.9B
Total Subsidies Tracked
3,214
Beneficiary Companies
291
Donor-Beneficiaries Matched
9% donor rate
$13.8M
Total Donated by Beneficiaries
County Overview
39 counties ranked by subsidy total. Click any county for full details.
Maury
$116.3M
Shelby
$30.2M
Knox
$0.5M
Davidson
$23.9M
Hamilton
$16.8M
Mcminn
$6.5M
Blount
$5.3M
Coffee
$0.0M
Houston
$1.5M
Wilson
$0.0M
Anderson
$0.0M
Hardin
$0.0M
Madison
$1.4M
Marshall
$0.0M
Montgomery
$0.1M
Perry
$1.0M
Rhea
$2.8M
Sequatchie
$0.0M
Williamson
$1.4M
Bradley
$2.7M
Sullivan
$2.3M
Bedford
$0.0M
Cocke
$0.1M
Cumberland
$0.0M
Key Findings
- 291 of 3,214 subsidized companies (9.1%) made campaign donations — $13.8M total.
- $7.2M in donations flowed from beneficiaries to 376 political committees. Top recipient: AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC ($1.9M).
- $1.92B in total subsidies tracked across 3,214 beneficiary companies in Tennessee.
Political Committee Activity
$7.2M
Total donated to committees
376
Committees receiving funds
Top recipient: AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC ($1889K — 100% beneficiary-funded)
All Counties
| County | Score | Total Subsidies | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maury | 67.0 | $116.3M | 0 |
| Shelby | 46.0 | $30.2M | 0 |
| Knox | 39.0 | $0.5M | 0 |
| Davidson | 13.0 | $23.9M | 0 |
| Hamilton | 9.0 | $16.8M | 0 |
| Mcminn | 4.0 | $6.5M | 0 |
| Blount | 3.0 | $5.3M | 0 |
| Coffee | 3.0 | — | 0 |
| Houston | 3.0 | $1.5M | 0 |
| Wilson | 3.0 | $0.0M | 0 |
| Anderson | 2.0 | — | 0 |
| Hardin | 2.0 | $0.0M | 0 |
| Madison | 2.0 | $1.4M | 0 |
| Marshall | 2.0 | $0.0M | 0 |
| Montgomery | 2.0 | $0.1M | 0 |
| Perry | 2.0 | $1.0M | 0 |
| Rhea | 2.0 | $2.8M | 0 |
| Sequatchie | 2.0 | — | 0 |
| Williamson | 2.0 | $1.4M | 0 |
| Bradley | 1.0 | $2.7M | 0 |
| Sullivan | 1.0 | $2.3M | 0 |
| Bedford | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Cocke | 0.0 | $0.1M | 0 |
| Cumberland | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Franklin | 0.0 | $0.1M | 0 |
| Gibson | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Giles | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Greene | 0.0 | $0.4M | 0 |
| Hamblen | 0.0 | $0.9M | 0 |
| Lauderdale | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Loudon | 0.0 | $0.1M | 0 |
| Marion | 0.0 | $0.1M | 0 |
| Mcnairy | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Putnam | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Rutherford | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Sumner | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Trousdale | 0.0 | — | 0 |
| Weakley | 0.0 | $0.2M | 0 |
| White | 0.0 | $0.5M | 0 |
How we calculated this
State summaries aggregate county-level data from Good Jobs First subsidy records cross-referenced with state campaign finance databases. Donor rates reflect the percentage of subsidy recipients matched to campaign contributors. County scorecards use a composite weighted score (subsidy concentration 35%, donor overlap 30%, tax burden 20%, WARN notices 15%).